Active Users:642 Time:22/03/2026 04:02:33 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1474 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 944 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 965 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 877 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 900 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 959 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 915 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 869 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 836 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 935 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1092 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 882 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 882 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 809 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 818 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 788 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 863 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1037 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 878 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 861 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 882 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 857 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 829 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1372 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 908 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 857 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 839 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 858 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 794 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 926 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 868 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 809 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 806 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 788 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 893 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 950 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 910 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message