Active Users:554 Time:19/09/2025 01:56:05 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1335 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 818 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 850 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 757 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 832 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 794 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 751 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 726 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 791 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 944 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 755 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 757 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 692 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 770 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 692 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 660 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 740 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 888 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 818 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 750 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 735 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 751 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 715 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 699 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1203 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 790 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 731 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 710 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 726 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 688 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 792 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 773 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 726 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 706 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 707 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 677 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 805 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 795 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 723 Views

Reply to Message