It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O

Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1264 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 778 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 687 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 683 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 825 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 663 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 624 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 673 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 689 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 637 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 622 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 640 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1131 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 708 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 660 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 612 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 658 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 621 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 666 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 641 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 687 Views