It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1424 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
918 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
818 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
824 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1041 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
841 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
754 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
813 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
827 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
788 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
783 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
788 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1312 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
861 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
811 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
782 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
820 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
739 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
821 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
767 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
827 Views

