It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1474 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
965 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
877 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
900 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1092 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
882 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
809 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
861 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
882 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
857 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
829 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
847 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1372 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
908 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
857 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
839 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
858 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
794 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
868 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
810 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
893 Views

