It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1445 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
942 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
851 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
863 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1062 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
857 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
783 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
836 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
857 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
829 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
808 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
815 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1342 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
879 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
830 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
811 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
835 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
772 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
844 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
783 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
858 Views

