Active Users:581 Time:19/12/2025 01:38:05 PM
But is it...? Digital_Eon Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff.


Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1424 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 889 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 918 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 818 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 824 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 901 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 871 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 815 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 793 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 875 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1041 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 840 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 841 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 754 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 844 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 768 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 737 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 815 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 971 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 884 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 832 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 813 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 827 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 788 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 783 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1312 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 861 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 811 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 782 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 820 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 739 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 858 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 864 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 821 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 767 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 750 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 746 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 827 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 893 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 864 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 793 Views

Reply to Message