Active Users:376 Time:01/05/2025 07:46:26 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1264 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 741 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 778 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 687 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 683 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 746 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 730 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 692 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 663 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 720 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 825 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 693 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 663 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 624 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 702 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 626 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 590 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 677 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 814 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 751 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 677 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 672 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 687 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 637 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 622 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1130 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 708 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 657 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 610 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 657 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 621 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 725 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 697 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 665 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 640 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 647 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 610 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 687 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 740 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 724 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 655 Views

Reply to Message