Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.
NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1446 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
944 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
852 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
864 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1062 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
858 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
784 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
837 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
858 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
829 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
809 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
816 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1343 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
880 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
831 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
812 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
835 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
773 Views
But is it...?
- 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
882 Views
Well the point of the original poster
- 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
893 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
844 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
859 Views

