Active Users:190 Time:19/05/2024 01:35:54 AM
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM
Yeah, too bad Olver =/= Gaidal. :(

Taimandred's another great example; the only reason it's not an OBVIOUS fact is the author said point blank it's not true. But OTHERWISE it's an airtight, irrefutable and utterly compelling theory. :P
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 1708 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 382 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 729 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 692 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1019 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 734 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 575 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 610 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 576 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 626 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 691 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 623 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 574 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 694 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 661 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 368 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 888 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 279 Views

Reply to Message