Active Users:429 Time:17/09/2025 11:21:17 PM
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM
Yeah, too bad Olver =/= Gaidal. :(

Taimandred's another great example; the only reason it's not an OBVIOUS fact is the author said point blank it's not true. But OTHERWISE it's an airtight, irrefutable and utterly compelling theory. :P
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 1936 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 488 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 951 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 910 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1253 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 969 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 788 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 834 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 831 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 860 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 917 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 848 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 798 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 932 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 901 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 486 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1146 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 377 Views

Reply to Message