Active Users:455 Time:18/06/2025 07:30:06 AM
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM
Yeah, too bad Olver =/= Gaidal. :(

Taimandred's another great example; the only reason it's not an OBVIOUS fact is the author said point blank it's not true. But OTHERWISE it's an airtight, irrefutable and utterly compelling theory. :P
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 1879 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 460 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 887 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 854 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1190 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 902 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 738 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 777 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 768 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 800 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 863 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 795 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 731 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 859 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 838 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 453 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1082 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 348 Views

Reply to Message