Active Users:822 Time:29/10/2026 11:46:29 AM
/tGS: These are damned good books. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
I mean woah. I care again. I'm passionate about WoT again.
I actually want to know what happens next, not just because it's the Last Battle. It's amazing how much more exciting the finish line looks when you aren't plodding deliberately on towards it!!

ye God I actually laughed with giddy excitement at these books for the first time in years!!


Stuff your time lines. We're goin' to WAR, BABY! WAAAARRRRR!!!!


((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1787 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 458 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1139 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1145 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 1034 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 1002 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1059 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1138 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 1025 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1124 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 965 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1152 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 998 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1151 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 1036 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1220 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1058 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 1046 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1072 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 474 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 945 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1050 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 928 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 486 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1205 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 1000 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 1037 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 1006 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 975 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 950 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1118 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 997 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1071 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 966 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 950 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 494 Views

Reply to Message