Active Users:349 Time:17/06/2025 10:53:32 AM
/tGS: These are damned good books. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
I mean woah. I care again. I'm passionate about WoT again.
I actually want to know what happens next, not just because it's the Last Battle. It's amazing how much more exciting the finish line looks when you aren't plodding deliberately on towards it!!

ye God I actually laughed with giddy excitement at these books for the first time in years!!


Stuff your time lines. We're goin' to WAR, BABY! WAAAARRRRR!!!!


((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1497 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 338 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 854 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 857 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 778 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 723 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 791 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 833 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 724 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 836 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 700 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 872 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 721 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 860 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 728 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 915 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 780 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 768 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 774 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 343 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 696 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 755 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 657 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 358 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 882 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 711 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 778 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 726 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 704 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 676 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 832 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 685 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 812 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 692 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 674 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 356 Views

Reply to Message