Active Users:334 Time:17/06/2025 11:37:42 AM
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO ajfurst Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))

How could you say this? You reach the end then jump back in chapter 2 to go over the same timeline.

Once the latest Cooper timeline comes out I'm going to read the chapters in a chronological order (or as close to as can be gotten). I expect it highlight even more how stuffing Perrin and Mat's setbacks and Avi's visions after Veins of Gold takes away from the sense of despair (A Memory of Light) RJ was trying to show before Rand's epiphany.

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

'Team Light' would have looked fraked. A Rand victory almost as bad as defeat, the other two ta'veren tied down, Egwene no longer able to influence the Tower Aes Sedai, with the Seanchan plan to attack revealed (but not yet launched) and Avi's vision to ram it all home.

TOM would have the showed 'Team Light' (except the Seanchan) getting their act together, with all plot lines pulling out of despair / setbacks at once (except how the Seanchan will eventually be dealt with).
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1497 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 338 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 854 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 857 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 778 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 723 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 791 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 834 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 724 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 836 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 700 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 872 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 721 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 860 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 728 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 915 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 780 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 768 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 774 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 343 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 697 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 756 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 657 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 358 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 883 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 711 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 778 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 726 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 704 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 676 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 832 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 685 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 812 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 693 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 674 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 356 Views

Reply to Message