I think I have almost the opposite reaction. I've been having the same problem with TGS And TOM that I had with Mistborn. I really liked the Mistborn premise but I simply couldn't make myself care about any of the characters, when people died I thought "meh" and kept reading which is not what you want in a book. I now find myself feeling to some degree the same way about his WOT books. While there are still scenes that moved me they all fell a little flat, the only reason I had any emotional investment in them at all is down to the long standing relationship I have with the characters involved through years of reading and re-reading WOT. You could say I was moved in spite of Brandon's writing, not because of it.
Brandon (in his own books too) is good at build up, poor at emotional endings. RJ was always excellent at them. I'm 100% certain his Morgase reunions would have been wonderful.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
- 1479 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
- 837 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
- 809 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
- 706 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
- 677 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
- 850 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
- 840 Views
BS style
27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
- 898 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
- 761 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
- 750 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
- 647 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
- 755 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
- 678 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
- 348 Views
Not so much
27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
- 865 Views
I agree with this
27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
- 693 Views
Have some question
28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
- 759 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
- 706 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
- 682 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
- 660 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
- 988 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
- 646 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
- 707 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
- 752 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes.
29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
- 718 Views

"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
- 419 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
- 719 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
- 665 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
- 743 Views