Active Users:2414 Time:08/05/2026 04:48:04 AM
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
it would NO WAY be a one book ending that some ppl here keep saying he would have made the book.


That is not what "ppl" are saying. "People" are well aware that this book might have been split even with RJ behind the wheel. The thing is, though, that RJ would have split the story in a way faithful to his outline. Sanderson's sin here is that he had the arrogance to completely restructure RJ's outline, which has resulted in much poorer story.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1713 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 420 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1066 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1063 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 950 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 925 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 985 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1048 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 932 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1042 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 886 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1073 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 917 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1058 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 923 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1144 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 985 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 957 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 993 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 433 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 874 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 962 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 843 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 443 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1112 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 912 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 960 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 930 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 895 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 878 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1025 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 902 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 996 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 883 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 869 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 452 Views

Reply to Message