Active Users:917 Time:15/12/2025 05:24:45 PM
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good). Joel Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
The Gathering Storm was the first one since LoC that I literally couldn't stop reading, but I don't put ToM on the same level. Of course, that doesn't mean it's barely worthy of being toilet paper; it's still light years better than TPoD, for example. I'm not sure why it always has to be "Jordan/Sanderson is God/Anti-Christ" with no middle ground.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1617 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 380 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 968 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 965 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 863 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 836 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 886 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 942 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 850 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 947 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 801 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 977 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 829 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 972 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 837 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1050 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 876 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 877 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 888 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 398 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 784 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 862 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 751 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 412 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1009 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 817 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 877 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 844 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 796 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 787 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 932 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 803 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 915 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 800 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 783 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 412 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good). - 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM 1104 Views

Reply to Message