Active Users:1088 Time:31/07/2026 07:26:38 AM
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM

I also read TGS and TOM one after the other and would have to disagree wth your comment there too. the timeline jumping around was very noticeable and not sensible or smooth at all - after hearing of Perrin being in Caemlyn with the Queen we suddenly go to him being mired in the middle of nowhere.


Where exactly we seen this? I don't remember hearing of Perrin being in Caemlyn with the Queen and see him mired in the middly of nowhere.

You made this up.



Nope, just remembered it not quite right :) I was thinking of Rand and Tam's scene towards the end of TGS where Tam mentions the Whitecloaks and the queen. Then the reference to Elayne threw my memory off, I thought he'd said they were all in Caemlyn together at that point which he didn't.

He's most certainly mired in the middle of nowhere in TOM, how else would you describe wading through mud for days?

C xx


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1738 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 439 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1102 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1095 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 982 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 956 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1019 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1078 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 962 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1073 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 920 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1103 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 951 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1099 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 980 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1177 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1012 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 997 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1026 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 453 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 907 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1003 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 881 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 465 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1148 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 950 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 992 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 962 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 932 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 906 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1063 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 937 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1031 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 912 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 906 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 473 Views

Reply to Message