Active Users:651 Time:03/08/2025 12:44:10 PM
Re: Have some question charlene Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.


My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.

C xx
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1511 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 346 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 865 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 872 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 794 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 739 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 806 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 850 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 741 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 851 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 713 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 887 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 735 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 877 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 741 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 928 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 796 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 782 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 787 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 350 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 709 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 770 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 673 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 366 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 899 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 722 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 791 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 742 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 720 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 690 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 844 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 699 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 824 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 709 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 686 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 364 Views

Reply to Message