Active Users:2187 Time:08/05/2026 04:53:01 AM
Re: Have some question charlene Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.


My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.

C xx
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1714 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 420 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1067 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1064 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 951 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 927 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 987 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1050 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 933 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1044 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 887 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1075 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 919 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1060 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 923 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1146 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 987 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 959 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 994 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 433 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 876 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 964 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 845 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 443 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1114 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 913 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 962 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 932 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 897 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 879 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1026 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 904 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 998 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 885 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 871 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 452 Views

Reply to Message