Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
Zeratul Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.
Then TGS would've been bashed by most readers, and rightly so, because it would've been all setup and no plot resolutions at all, and a lot of people would've given up on the series.
Sanderson and Team Jordan made the right choice, they couldn't afford that risk given the scepticism after the change of author and given how much nearly everyone hated CoT for lacking plot resolutions.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1322 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
700 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
669 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
567 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
537 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
707 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
700 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
759 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
619 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
604 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
508 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
609 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
527 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
285 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
719 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
621 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
561 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
542 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
515 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
846 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
496 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
566 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
610 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
599 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
599 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
352 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
569 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
513 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
590 Views