Active Users:207 Time:18/05/2024 04:11:57 PM
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop ajfurst Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

Then TGS would've been bashed by most readers, and rightly so, because it would've been all setup and no plot resolutions at all, and a lot of people would've given up on the series.

Sanderson and Team Jordan made the right choice, they couldn't afford that risk given the scepticism after the change of author and given how much nearly everyone hated CoT for lacking plot resolutions.

COT was basically 'WOW big channeling going on, view point 7 on it, followed by view point 8', with some 'Woah is me, Faile was captured before and I still haven't gotten her by the end' with the only bits of action Ituralde's in the prologue and Egwene's capture in the Epilogue.

TGS split as I suggest would still have had:

Rand's descent and the death of Semirhage
Egwene winning over the Aes Sedai until Elaida has her imprisoned (cliffhanger 1)
Mat fighting in hinderstap then the Gholam at the end (cliffhanger 2)
Perrin fighting Slayer, then finding himself trapped by the Dreamspike having to either fight the Whitecloaks or win his trial (cliffhanger 3)
Aviendha's visions

Plus you still had Tylee and Ituralde's battles in TGS would still be there. Nothing like COT. And with 3 cliffhangers at the end I'd be more inclined to think fans would be even more highly anticipating TOM to see what happened.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1322 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 267 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 700 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 694 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 627 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 563 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 632 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 669 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 567 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 673 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 535 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 706 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 565 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 700 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 566 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 759 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 618 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 604 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 609 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 278 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 527 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 572 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 505 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 285 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 717 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 543 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 620 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 561 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 542 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 514 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 676 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 522 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 636 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 533 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 505 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 284 Views

Reply to Message