Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
That's far more convoluted. To be fair, Catch 22 skips around on purpose - that's part of the insanity of war.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1736 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
1102 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
1077 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
962 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
919 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
1102 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
1098 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
1175 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
1011 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
996 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
903 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
1025 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
905 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
465 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
1146 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
991 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
960 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
930 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
904 Views
I had no problem following the jumps.
- 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM
910 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
- 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
904 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
1227 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
879 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
956 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
1001 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
974 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
974 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
616 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
1031 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
910 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
1010 Views