Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
That's far more convoluted. To be fair, Catch 22 skips around on purpose - that's part of the insanity of war.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1663 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
1011 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
984 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
881 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
836 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
1018 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
1004 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
1084 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
920 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
901 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
825 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
932 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
818 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
423 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
1054 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
913 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
875 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
829 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
823 Views
I had no problem following the jumps.
- 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM
835 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
- 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
814 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
1135 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
794 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
877 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
922 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
888 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
888 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
572 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
929 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
825 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
923 Views