Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
That's far more convoluted. To be fair, Catch 22 skips around on purpose - that's part of the insanity of war.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
- 1322 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
- 700 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
- 669 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
- 567 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
- 535 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
- 706 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
- 700 Views
BS style
27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
- 759 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
- 618 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
- 604 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
- 507 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
- 609 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
- 527 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
- 285 Views
Not so much
27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
- 717 Views
Have some question
28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
- 620 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
- 561 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
- 542 Views
Re: Have some question
28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
- 514 Views
I had no problem following the jumps.
29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM
- 533 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
- 506 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
- 846 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
- 496 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
- 565 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
- 609 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes.
29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
- 599 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
- 352 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
- 569 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
- 513 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
- 590 Views