Active Users:700 Time:29/10/2026 11:43:51 AM
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book ajfurst Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM
It's a pity they didn't split it into two books instead of three. Three books split by clusters or chronologically was going to be flawed in one of the ways discussed. Two books could have been split with it ending after Perrin destroyed the Dreamspike and the Shadowspawn.

So by that point in time you'd have had Rand, Egwene, Perrin's arc's completed, Avi's visions taking place when all those arcs are held up/in despair. Leaving only Perrin's talks with Elayne, Elayne's 'exciting' antics in Cairhien and Mat's ToG visit pushed to AMOL of the main arcs. Along with some of Lan and the Epilogue. And of those only the Moraine one missing would have disappointed fans. Sure TGS would have had 500 odd of the 750 odd pages of TOM and required more pages and/or a smaller font, but it would have resolved the problems of chronology - which for me is not the out of order, it's the lack of despair in TOM it caused - whilst still giving fans plenty of resolution.

Of course we would have had an extra 9-12 months to wait for the book in that case, so it wouldn't have been perfect. It would have been the best option though IMO. TGS would have had the Light set back then ready, then AMOL the Last Battle. A neat division, rather then an arbitrary one (TGS could just have easily been Rand and Perrin or Rand and Mat, with TOM Egwene and Perrin or Egwene and Mat).
This message last edited by ajfurst on 01/12/2010 at 01:46:19 AM
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1785 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 458 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1138 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1143 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 1034 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 1001 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1057 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1136 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 1024 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1124 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 963 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1150 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 997 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1149 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 1036 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1218 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1056 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 1045 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1070 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 474 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 944 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1048 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 926 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 486 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1204 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 998 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 1036 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 1004 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 973 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 950 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1116 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 995 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1069 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 964 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 948 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 494 Views

Reply to Message