Active Users:671 Time:19/12/2025 01:43:36 AM
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book ajfurst Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM
It's a pity they didn't split it into two books instead of three. Three books split by clusters or chronologically was going to be flawed in one of the ways discussed. Two books could have been split with it ending after Perrin destroyed the Dreamspike and the Shadowspawn.

So by that point in time you'd have had Rand, Egwene, Perrin's arc's completed, Avi's visions taking place when all those arcs are held up/in despair. Leaving only Perrin's talks with Elayne, Elayne's 'exciting' antics in Cairhien and Mat's ToG visit pushed to AMOL of the main arcs. Along with some of Lan and the Epilogue. And of those only the Moraine one missing would have disappointed fans. Sure TGS would have had 500 odd of the 750 odd pages of TOM and required more pages and/or a smaller font, but it would have resolved the problems of chronology - which for me is not the out of order, it's the lack of despair in TOM it caused - whilst still giving fans plenty of resolution.

Of course we would have had an extra 9-12 months to wait for the book in that case, so it wouldn't have been perfect. It would have been the best option though IMO. TGS would have had the Light set back then ready, then AMOL the Last Battle. A neat division, rather then an arbitrary one (TGS could just have easily been Rand and Perrin or Rand and Mat, with TOM Egwene and Perrin or Egwene and Mat).
This message last edited by ajfurst on 01/12/2010 at 01:46:19 AM
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1619 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 381 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 972 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 968 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 869 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 841 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 889 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 943 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 854 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 952 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 804 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 984 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 831 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 973 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 840 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1051 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 882 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 879 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 891 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 400 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 786 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 867 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 755 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 414 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1013 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 818 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 886 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 847 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 798 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 789 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 934 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 806 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 918 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 803 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 784 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 413 Views

Reply to Message