Active Users:612 Time:18/12/2025 12:34:11 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."

If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.

It means you think that she should not have been able to do so.

Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??


Maybe you have a reading disability bitch.

"It just shouldnt have been an Aes Sedai to do it."

Not an Aes Sedai, meaning not Elaida - an Aes Sedai.

Don't flame me because you disagree, I will gladly flame you back. Just disagree.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2126 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 1036 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 939 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1103 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 491 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 828 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 451 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 399 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 848 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 732 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 821 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 833 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 762 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 890 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 750 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 843 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 834 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 695 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 762 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 860 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 785 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 732 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 363 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1134 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 935 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 753 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 771 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 367 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 406 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 366 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 372 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 772 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 824 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 778 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 803 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 364 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 309 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 381 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 743 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 927 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 815 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 360 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 323 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 366 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 720 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 721 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 720 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 949 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 721 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1092 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 726 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 788 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes