1. No one will be killed BY the Travelling weave except accidentally if he / she's unlucky or stupid enough to walk into an opening Gateway. That's what the Oath is about.
2. The main idea of the Seanchan is to LEASH the AS, not to kill them. BTW, why were the Salidar AS able to weave a Gateway to Tar Valon to send their ARMY through? According to your reasoning, this shouldn't have been possible either.
I disagree, it's all about intent, and in the case of Elaida, all she has to do is believe that by showing them the weave she will cause deaths. That would suffice for it to be 'used as a weapon'.
Elaida made herself believe many things true or untrue, as did all Aes Sedai, but especially her. I can't believe that she wouldn't expect that her weave could directly cause death. We JUST saw that I think the Aes Sedai with Perrin refused to even cause an earth tremor near the WHITECLOAKS, because it MIGHT possibly do something which MIGHT cause their deaths.
It's all about what they convince themselves that their weaves will accomplish, and hence Elaida should know from her treatment by the Seanchan and her carefulness in hiding Travelling, what the Seanchan will do with her weave, Period.
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
2292 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
1206 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
1094 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
1252 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
1010 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
886 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
972 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
996 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
944 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
1051 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
904 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
994 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
994 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
844 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
913 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
1016 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
937 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
889 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
449 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
933 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
1006 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
942 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
968 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
439 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
403 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
916 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
407 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
438 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
877 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
884 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
890 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
1254 Views

*NM*
*NM*