Active Users:1886 Time:04/05/2026 07:47:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yeah I am malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.

"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."


Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.

Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2201 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 1114 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 1004 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1176 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 522 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 907 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 479 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 427 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 917 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 798 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 892 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 895 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 818 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 962 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 815 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 908 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 900 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 755 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 823 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 930 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 855 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 798 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 389 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1221 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 1000 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 818 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 838 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 400 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 431 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 400 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 400 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 853 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 895 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 845 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 878 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 394 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 346 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 408 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 806 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 1002 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 888 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 384 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 351 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 395 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 781 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 784 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 776 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 1085 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 796 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1155 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 782 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 866 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes