Active Users:331 Time:17/06/2025 04:43:25 PM
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
Helene argued with your statement that she should not have been able to show them the weave, due to the oath about weapons. You argued this point for a short while.

Then suddenly, you were claiming "uhm, but I said that we didn't have to see Elaida or an Aes Sedai do it."

well, yes, you did, but that has no bearing on the argument being made. It's a red herring. It has nothing to do with whether she or any other Aes Sedai was able to do so. This is a matter of world magic mechanics, where as the point that we didn't need to see them do it is a matter of plot development mechanics. Your point that it was probably just so we saw what happened to Elaida is quite valid and likely. It just has nothing to do with whether she was able to show them how to make a gateway.

So either you merely do not know how to argue, or you do not have the ability to comprehend what you read.



No what I said in essence was that it strained incredulity to see Elaida do it when in my opinion that her Oath should have constrained her. She still believes she is the Amyrlin, she knows that the Seanchan will likely kill Aes Sedai by her teaching them this weave, therefore she should believe the weave is a weapon in her hands.

Therefore I stated something to the effect of 'why did it have to be Elaida to show this weave', when it would have crossed no boundaries for someone like an Accepted to do it, when they have no Oath, no possible even shred of reason that would not allow them to perform it. An Aes Sedai, ESPECIALLY Elaida who still thinks she is Amyrlin should not (in my opinion it felt sketchy, and used solely for the purpose of showing Elaida and disregarded the Oath completely).

Now, go ahead and curse at me all you like, and masquerade your insults by saying things like I have a 'reading disability' because I don't agree with you.

The point is I just disagree with you, it's you that decided to lower yourself and attack me personally.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2048 Views
The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 948 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 869 Views
Wrong for two reasons - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1026 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 458 Views
Go jump in a lake - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 753 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 418 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 364 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 771 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 658 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 753 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 759 Views
Yeah I am - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 692 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 821 Views
Go dude yourself brother. - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 685 Views
wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 775 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 752 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 631 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 685 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 794 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 715 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 630 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 328 Views
go read the boooks more closely - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1055 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 847 Views
Wrong - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 681 Views
This - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 711 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 327 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 375 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 332 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 326 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 684 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 751 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 717 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 736 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 270 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 347 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 831 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 755 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 318 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 868 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 661 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1031 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 652 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 710 Views

Reply to Message