Active Users:799 Time:17/09/2026 10:11:55 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."

If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.

It means you think that she should not have been able to do so.

Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??


Maybe you have a reading disability bitch.

"It just shouldnt have been an Aes Sedai to do it."

Not an Aes Sedai, meaning not Elaida - an Aes Sedai.

Don't flame me because you disagree, I will gladly flame you back. Just disagree.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2272 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 1185 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 1073 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1232 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 553 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 976 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 510 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 460 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 987 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 862 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 951 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 968 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 900 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 1030 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 883 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 973 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 969 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 819 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 886 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 991 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 913 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 866 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 422 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1294 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 1065 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 879 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 901 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 435 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 471 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 431 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 433 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 911 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 978 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 916 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 949 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 423 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 379 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 434 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 876 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 1062 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 966 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 416 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 385 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 424 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 856 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 847 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 845 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 1157 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 866 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1213 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 838 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 931 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes