Active Users:352 Time:17/06/2025 01:46:50 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM
I may be wrong on this, but I thought that the biggest problem with the gholam going through the gateway is that the gholam acts like Mat's medallion and stops the weaves. In this case, it shouldn't be able to go through any kind of gateway but rather destroy the weave for the gateway upon touching it.


The gateway itself is not a weave but a hole in the space. Gholam wasn't touching the weave at all. The same way, Mat wasn't touching gateways when he was travelling through it with Rand in earlier books.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2219 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1368 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1188 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1169 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 509 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 510 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1072 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 882 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1097 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 475 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1102 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1000 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1044 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1057 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1021 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1029 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 856 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 898 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 834 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 880 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 481 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 906 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 931 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1011 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 920 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 998 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 858 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1141 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 916 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1007 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 950 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 866 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 927 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1118 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 997 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 983 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 884 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 592 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1082 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 851 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 861 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 455 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1029 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1012 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 934 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 936 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 946 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 969 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes