Active Users:365 Time:01/05/2025 12:30:10 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM
yeah, isn't that how the "deathgates" work? Shadow spawn can't survive being touched by the O.P. So when they pass through a gateway it kills them. Tollocs check in but they don't check out.


well, IIRC the deathgates mostly work on the principle that the gateway edges are extremely sharp, and that's the reason they open and close and they have not a round shape: that way, no one would survive a deathgate. The fact that shadowspawn can't pass through them is just a "plus".


The aim of the deathgate to kill a trolloc is to pass it through the gateway thus killing it in the process... I imagine if a channeler wanted an extremely sharp edge to slice trollocs they can use focused air or anything else. Gateways for that purpose are not cost effective.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2131 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1346 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1165 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1147 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 501 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 501 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1052 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 865 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1078 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 467 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1014 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 979 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 956 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1036 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 935 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1006 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 832 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 877 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 806 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 858 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 471 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 881 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 912 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 924 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 897 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 911 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 836 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1054 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 895 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 918 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 928 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 842 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 905 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1029 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 979 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 962 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 867 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 521 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1061 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 828 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 839 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 444 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1010 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 931 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 913 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 846 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 926 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 952 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes