Active Users:576 Time:24/03/2026 05:29:37 PM
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.

Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.

They prepared the place where to kill gholam long before that. It was explained after the battle was over, they asked Kin to prepare gateway for that and Kin weren't happy to aid in the battle. Burning of the house though, wasn't prepared and happened by mistake.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2430 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1566 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1366 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1399 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 602 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 604 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1267 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1088 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1277 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 568 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1276 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1224 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1255 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1268 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1212 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1238 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1110 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 1080 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 1009 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 1071 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 573 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 1104 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1186 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1182 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1130 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1216 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1077 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1329 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1154 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1225 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1209 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1074 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1127 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1377 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1219 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1073 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 681 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1277 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1032 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1056 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 541 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1265 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1247 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1150 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1157 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1112 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1176 Views

Reply to Message