Active Users:576 Time:24/03/2026 05:29:37 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM
Which does not require one to know a location.


Which requires skimming to the house, which requires knowing the house. There would be no problem if they opened the gateway from the house, but they avoided that to try to stop the gholam from noticing.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2430 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1566 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1366 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1399 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 602 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 604 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1267 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1088 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1277 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 568 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1276 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1224 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1254 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1268 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1212 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1238 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1110 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 1080 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 1009 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 1071 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 573 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 1104 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1186 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1182 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1129 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1216 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1077 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1329 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1154 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1225 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1209 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1074 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1127 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1377 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 1192 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1219 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1073 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 681 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1277 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1032 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1056 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 541 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1265 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1247 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1149 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1157 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1112 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1176 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes