Active Users:328 Time:16/05/2024 11:36:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Gateways rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM
Well, it's different in that the gateway opened from the other side, which is the point, as the book says.


It's possible, but convoluted. Why couldn't she have opened a skimming gateway, let it go and opened it again from inside the skimming place? Isn't that easier and just as good? And not consistent with the book.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 1961 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1160 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1003 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 965 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 404 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 428 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 867 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 702 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 923 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 401 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 806 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 820 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 798 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 839 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 766 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 800 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 653 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 702 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 636 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 684 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 407 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 722 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 741 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 743 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 747 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 736 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 666 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 873 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 731 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 756 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 760 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 654 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 738 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 841 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 794 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 800 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 688 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 427 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 858 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 672 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 669 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 365 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 846 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 768 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 742 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 674 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 764 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 774 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes