Active Users:148 Time:01/06/2024 12:29:31 AM
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.


Caemlyn is a big city. They would need to organise a lot of pre-determined locations to have any sort of coverage, which would be determined by how far Talmanes was prepared to lead the gholam. I would guess the he wouldn't try for more than 100 metres/yards. How many places would they need to give that sort of coverage across the city? If it is 1km across, then 100 locations. 10km, then 10,000 locations. Too many.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 1968 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1166 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1012 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 975 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 410 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 431 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 872 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 708 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 929 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 404 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 814 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 829 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 807 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 846 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 775 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 807 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 659 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 709 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 644 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 693 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 410 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 727 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 750 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 752 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 752 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 744 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 675 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 890 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 738 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 763 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 769 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 660 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 744 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 851 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 808 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 694 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 432 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 863 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 679 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 672 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 370 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 854 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 775 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 747 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 679 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 771 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 783 Views

Reply to Message