Active Users:214 Time:20/04/2024 05:03:20 AM
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/01/2011 10:02:27 PM

I don't necessarily believe this either. However, there is precedent in Shara and the Aiel Waste, and presumably also the Isle of Madmen. If Ajimbura is typical of a rural Seanchan commoner, then the conquerors may be right.

How do you even know Shara is barbaric? And the Aiel are only "barbaric" because they're different from the people in the Wetlands.


Their initial justification is through military might and the threat of force.

Might is right isn't a justification.

However, their hostile takeover is being legitimized through popular support, which they are gaining rapidly. The vast majority of people in the conquered countries (those not counted among the ranks of channelers, high nobility in some cases, and other dissidents) seem to prefer the peace and stability of the Seanchan regime.

So, except for those who oppose them, nobody opposes them? Shocking!
Reply to message
Seanchan Takeover of Randland - 22/01/2011 11:25:36 PM 1973 Views
You mean utter anarchy and a dangerously stratified society? - 23/01/2011 07:24:48 AM 742 Views
The situation in Seanchan isn't that unique - 23/01/2011 07:49:28 AM 756 Views
Except with continous rebellion. - 23/01/2011 12:13:17 PM 731 Views
That's to be expected. - 23/01/2011 12:56:07 PM 730 Views
The anarchy is what happens in the absence of Seanchan power. - 27/01/2011 01:10:56 PM 702 Views
Yes. That is a flaw of Seanchan governance. - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 623 Views
It's not the Empire's fault, and that flaw is not being duplicated in the wetlands - 28/01/2011 11:24:00 PM 878 Views
Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 02:09:05 AM 689 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM 723 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 10:02:27 PM 589 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 30/01/2011 03:56:23 AM 774 Views
They treat channelers like DOGS! so, No. *NM* - 23/01/2011 07:56:22 AM 382 Views
I treat my dog better *NM* - 23/01/2011 10:28:08 AM 368 Views
Good point. *NM* - 24/01/2011 01:47:29 AM 392 Views
The Pattern certainly has some plan or purpose for the Seanchan. - 23/01/2011 10:59:33 AM 815 Views
That's what's scary. In many ways, the Seanchan embody the goals of the Pattern - 23/01/2011 11:41:35 PM 673 Views
I think it's interesting - 24/01/2011 09:23:40 AM 684 Views
There has been ta'veren since Hawkwing and before the Triple. - 28/01/2011 11:56:46 AM 677 Views
Who were they? - 29/01/2011 12:33:58 AM 626 Views
Um, no - 23/01/2011 11:36:24 AM 755 Views
look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:24:01 PM 708 Views
Re: look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:54:49 PM 719 Views
Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:09:54 PM 757 Views
Re: Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:22:28 PM 720 Views
a) most of that is your own extrapolation, not shown in the text - 23/01/2011 04:56:14 PM 712 Views
Yes. - 23/01/2011 04:47:30 PM 693 Views
Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM 691 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 681 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:33:00 PM 713 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 11:03:36 PM 665 Views
Not really - 23/01/2011 07:12:27 PM 679 Views
I disagree. - 25/01/2011 07:17:18 PM 678 Views
I see them as neccessary evil to eventually eliminate channeling. - 24/01/2011 08:04:21 PM 774 Views
Lack of knowledge doesn't mean the One Power vanishes or is destroyed. - 26/01/2011 04:03:22 PM 601 Views
If OP still existed, you'd still have sparkers even "today". *NM* - 26/01/2011 06:34:50 PM 355 Views
Not exactly; genetics are more complicated. - 27/01/2011 09:48:48 PM 652 Views
No - 25/01/2011 05:41:09 PM 759 Views
Ah, um, no. - 29/01/2011 11:53:16 PM 668 Views
The thing is - 04/02/2011 05:29:15 AM 628 Views
They didn't break anything - 04/02/2011 02:13:10 PM 670 Views
Contemplate this then.... - 04/02/2011 10:29:09 PM 694 Views
Re: Contemplate this then.... - 06/02/2011 12:44:21 AM 667 Views

Reply to Message