Active Users:2101 Time:03/08/2026 12:26:45 AM
Not necessarily sleepinghour Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM
Instead, having a country with two rulers with equal power would bring it into chaos eventually, very non-borderlander.

Prior to the Seanchan invasion, Tarabon also had two rulers with equal power: the King and Panarch. Amathera wasn't a very good ruler, but nothing says the system couldn't have worked well had both been competent and capable of working together. Which should be easier if the rulers also happen to be married.
Reply to message
Do you realize - 15/05/2011 07:29:13 PM 2361 Views
If only... - 15/05/2011 08:28:45 PM 1211 Views
How dare you assume a king outranks an Aes Sedai in his own kingdom and palace?! - 16/05/2011 03:22:19 AM 1020 Views
Or any woman for that matter. *NM* - 16/05/2011 01:00:55 PM 446 Views
True, but Aes Sedai are more equal than others. *MN* - 16/05/2011 09:11:40 PM 823 Views
Well actually - 16/05/2011 06:02:57 PM 1004 Views
I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 02:01:31 AM 966 Views
Re: I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 872 Views
Not necessarily - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM 971 Views
That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 05:03:59 AM 894 Views
exactly - 19/05/2011 08:06:43 AM 940 Views
Re: That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 09:10:33 AM 1052 Views
Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:39:06 PM 1003 Views
Re: Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:53:55 PM 1060 Views
Ah, I missed that part of the marriage bargain *NM* - 16/05/2011 09:46:34 PM 419 Views
You're mistaken... - 18/05/2011 02:49:51 PM 948 Views
Actually, if there is any truth to her Accepted test, he isn't THAT much in charge. - 17/05/2011 02:51:12 AM 1107 Views
Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 05:05:56 AM 937 Views
Re: Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 06:55:01 PM 880 Views
Ummm... that was exactly my point. - 17/05/2011 11:34:46 PM 922 Views
My point... - 18/05/2011 02:21:56 PM 959 Views
Of course the setting is malleable in TAR. - 19/05/2011 04:21:50 PM 933 Views

Reply to Message