Active Users:605 Time:14/12/2025 06:07:41 PM
Not necessarily sleepinghour Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM
Instead, having a country with two rulers with equal power would bring it into chaos eventually, very non-borderlander.

Prior to the Seanchan invasion, Tarabon also had two rulers with equal power: the King and Panarch. Amathera wasn't a very good ruler, but nothing says the system couldn't have worked well had both been competent and capable of working together. Which should be easier if the rulers also happen to be married.
Reply to message
Do you realize - 15/05/2011 07:29:13 PM 2234 Views
If only... - 15/05/2011 08:28:45 PM 1097 Views
How dare you assume a king outranks an Aes Sedai in his own kingdom and palace?! - 16/05/2011 03:22:19 AM 915 Views
Or any woman for that matter. *NM* - 16/05/2011 01:00:55 PM 399 Views
True, but Aes Sedai are more equal than others. *MN* - 16/05/2011 09:11:40 PM 699 Views
Well actually - 16/05/2011 06:02:57 PM 890 Views
I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 02:01:31 AM 843 Views
Re: I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 759 Views
Not necessarily - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM 852 Views
That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 05:03:59 AM 780 Views
exactly - 19/05/2011 08:06:43 AM 833 Views
Re: That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 09:10:33 AM 921 Views
Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:39:06 PM 897 Views
Re: Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:53:55 PM 941 Views
Ah, I missed that part of the marriage bargain *NM* - 16/05/2011 09:46:34 PM 368 Views
You're mistaken... - 18/05/2011 02:49:51 PM 843 Views
Actually, if there is any truth to her Accepted test, he isn't THAT much in charge. - 17/05/2011 02:51:12 AM 987 Views
Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 05:05:56 AM 828 Views
Re: Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 06:55:01 PM 758 Views
Ummm... that was exactly my point. - 17/05/2011 11:34:46 PM 807 Views
My point... - 18/05/2011 02:21:56 PM 836 Views
Of course the setting is malleable in TAR. - 19/05/2011 04:21:50 PM 814 Views

Reply to Message