Active Users:623 Time:03/08/2025 07:40:51 AM
Not necessarily sleepinghour Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM
Instead, having a country with two rulers with equal power would bring it into chaos eventually, very non-borderlander.

Prior to the Seanchan invasion, Tarabon also had two rulers with equal power: the King and Panarch. Amathera wasn't a very good ruler, but nothing says the system couldn't have worked well had both been competent and capable of working together. Which should be easier if the rulers also happen to be married.
Reply to message
Do you realize - 15/05/2011 07:29:13 PM 2180 Views
If only... - 15/05/2011 08:28:45 PM 1049 Views
How dare you assume a king outranks an Aes Sedai in his own kingdom and palace?! - 16/05/2011 03:22:19 AM 865 Views
Or any woman for that matter. *NM* - 16/05/2011 01:00:55 PM 366 Views
True, but Aes Sedai are more equal than others. *MN* - 16/05/2011 09:11:40 PM 651 Views
Well actually - 16/05/2011 06:02:57 PM 838 Views
I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 02:01:31 AM 792 Views
Re: I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 711 Views
Not necessarily - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM 795 Views
That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 05:03:59 AM 734 Views
exactly - 19/05/2011 08:06:43 AM 781 Views
Re: That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 09:10:33 AM 856 Views
Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:39:06 PM 838 Views
Re: Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:53:55 PM 885 Views
Ah, I missed that part of the marriage bargain *NM* - 16/05/2011 09:46:34 PM 341 Views
You're mistaken... - 18/05/2011 02:49:51 PM 797 Views
Actually, if there is any truth to her Accepted test, he isn't THAT much in charge. - 17/05/2011 02:51:12 AM 925 Views
Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 05:05:56 AM 769 Views
Re: Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 06:55:01 PM 699 Views
Ummm... that was exactly my point. - 17/05/2011 11:34:46 PM 748 Views
My point... - 18/05/2011 02:21:56 PM 789 Views
Of course the setting is malleable in TAR. - 19/05/2011 04:21:50 PM 763 Views

Reply to Message