Active Users:648 Time:17/03/2026 11:29:19 PM
Not necessarily sleepinghour Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM
Instead, having a country with two rulers with equal power would bring it into chaos eventually, very non-borderlander.

Prior to the Seanchan invasion, Tarabon also had two rulers with equal power: the King and Panarch. Amathera wasn't a very good ruler, but nothing says the system couldn't have worked well had both been competent and capable of working together. Which should be easier if the rulers also happen to be married.
Reply to message
Do you realize - 15/05/2011 07:29:13 PM 2293 Views
If only... - 15/05/2011 08:28:45 PM 1147 Views
How dare you assume a king outranks an Aes Sedai in his own kingdom and palace?! - 16/05/2011 03:22:19 AM 964 Views
Or any woman for that matter. *NM* - 16/05/2011 01:00:55 PM 413 Views
True, but Aes Sedai are more equal than others. *MN* - 16/05/2011 09:11:40 PM 750 Views
Well actually - 16/05/2011 06:02:57 PM 942 Views
I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 02:01:31 AM 892 Views
Re: I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 809 Views
Not necessarily - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM 911 Views
That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 05:03:59 AM 827 Views
exactly - 19/05/2011 08:06:43 AM 887 Views
Re: That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 09:10:33 AM 980 Views
Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:39:06 PM 948 Views
Re: Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:53:55 PM 987 Views
Ah, I missed that part of the marriage bargain *NM* - 16/05/2011 09:46:34 PM 389 Views
You're mistaken... - 18/05/2011 02:49:51 PM 886 Views
Actually, if there is any truth to her Accepted test, he isn't THAT much in charge. - 17/05/2011 02:51:12 AM 1048 Views
Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 05:05:56 AM 875 Views
Re: Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 06:55:01 PM 806 Views
Ummm... that was exactly my point. - 17/05/2011 11:34:46 PM 851 Views
My point... - 18/05/2011 02:21:56 PM 887 Views
Of course the setting is malleable in TAR. - 19/05/2011 04:21:50 PM 874 Views

Reply to Message