Active Users:572 Time:16/06/2026 08:10:54 AM
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon DomA Send a noteboard - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM
"Luckers: How much time does aMoL cover?

Brandon: It depends on which part of the world you are in. You will understand that when you read A Memory of Light."

I thought this bit was interesting. The way he responds seems to indicate more than just time discrepancies between POVs. Wonder what it means?


Most likely it's the only obvious answer: not all the storylines cover exactly the same timeline, and for instance he might have to go back in time in Logain's storyline, in the BT storyline, in Lan's storyline, in Loial's storyline etc. We already know this, he spoke of perhaps including some of what happened to Pevara and co. and he said he might include stuff about Danielle/Teslyn's plans for the BT, etc. If he doesn't go back in time some, then he will have to cover all of Loial's backstory with dialogue or POV reflections. Same for Lan - we'd likely catch up with him in the middle of battle if Brandon doesn't go back and cover some of what happened to him between his last scene and the start of the invasion from Tarwyn Gap.

This means in the main storyline (the one starting with the Fields of Merrilor where all the main cast was converging at the end of ToM) the timeline covered from there to the end of the book will be of X months (or more, or less), but in some minor storylines it will be longer, overlapping varying bits of the ToM timelines.

He basically dodged the question, he didn't want to answer how many months/days/years the last book cover, so he rather said it varied depending which area of the world the characters were in. But this was essentially a RAFO.

Of course this immediately sparked many time travel or TAR theories (people forget in TAR it's only perception of time that's different because time passing is how each dreamer perceives it's passing, this has no bearing on "real" time), but Brandon would not have answered that way if that was he had in mind.

Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3231 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1593 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 667 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1481 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1330 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 1220 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1377 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1755 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 732 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1395 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 783 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 712 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 736 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1417 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1454 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1265 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1681 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1464 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1341 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1319 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1509 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1450 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1312 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 1185 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1315 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1408 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1300 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1357 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1361 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1279 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 1233 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1374 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1291 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1683 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 1183 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1426 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1236 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1294 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1251 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 1173 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 1179 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 1204 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 1131 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1265 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 1185 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1269 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 1077 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 1128 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1487 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1326 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 1143 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 1232 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1456 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 1088 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1316 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1319 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1309 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1331 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1336 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 1194 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 1197 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 692 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 1192 Views

Reply to Message