Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
dacole Send a noteboard - 01/05/2012 12:08:33 AM
Heh I think your focus on this one topic and saying how BS is terrible for not having every aspect of it memorized is crazy. It is not as important as character, theme, and plot worldbuilding never is. Yes this is an opinion an opinion I have a right to.
The hatred for BS and his writing and how he is destroying the books has gotten rather ridiculous and using his answers to what ARE minor points as evidence of that is rather ridiculous IMHO. Certainly you have the right to disagree with me. Now if he was writing the characters in a way that made them out to be very different people than they were in the previous books then I would have a problem. Not having every tiny detail on instant recall, no that doesn't really bother me.
As for evidence that RJ made up some of the answers to his questions on the spot we only have to look to the contradictions that appeared in his work.
In general I feel a lot of people on this site spend to much time analyzing a set of fiction works *shrug* but then I am very much a work first kind of person (which seems to be a dieing breed unfortunately).
Glad to see I generated some discussion but reading through all these replies would take much more time than I want to devote to it.
There is no proof that RJ made things up to satisfy questions.
In your opinion, which I'll remind you is not the only opinion that counts. Some people like myself, Shannow and a few others enjoy talking about the OP. Others enjoy different things. For you to tell us what is actually important is as ridiculous as telling someone exactly what animals are important and what aren't in a zoo.
No one is obsessing. Some of us have made the OP into a pet subject. It's a fleshed out magical system that can be debated in detail, and not just a mystical magical system like in most other tales. Just because it doesn't interest you doesn't mean you should run down others who enjoy the topic.
The hatred for BS and his writing and how he is destroying the books has gotten rather ridiculous and using his answers to what ARE minor points as evidence of that is rather ridiculous IMHO. Certainly you have the right to disagree with me. Now if he was writing the characters in a way that made them out to be very different people than they were in the previous books then I would have a problem. Not having every tiny detail on instant recall, no that doesn't really bother me.
As for evidence that RJ made up some of the answers to his questions on the spot we only have to look to the contradictions that appeared in his work.
In general I feel a lot of people on this site spend to much time analyzing a set of fiction works *shrug* but then I am very much a work first kind of person (which seems to be a dieing breed unfortunately).
Glad to see I generated some discussion but reading through all these replies would take much more time than I want to devote to it.
Again as has been said. This obsessive attention to minor details is crazy and ridiculous and unimportant for the themes and major import of the story. As well I expect much of these type of answers Jordan was making up when asked. He did have to change things in the books to fit with his answers at some points.
There is no proof that RJ made things up to satisfy questions.
The "science" of how things in the world work are far and away extremely less important than the characters, the themes, and how those characters and themes are handled.
In your opinion, which I'll remind you is not the only opinion that counts. Some people like myself, Shannow and a few others enjoy talking about the OP. Others enjoy different things. For you to tell us what is actually important is as ridiculous as telling someone exactly what animals are important and what aren't in a zoo.
I certainly haven't been "obsessing" for twenty years over how exactly strong each of the channelers is...I would be getting myself some help if I had been. There is being a superfan and then there is being Sheldon Cooper level crazy.
No one is obsessing. Some of us have made the OP into a pet subject. It's a fleshed out magical system that can be debated in detail, and not just a mystical magical system like in most other tales. Just because it doesn't interest you doesn't mean you should run down others who enjoy the topic.
Very interesting QA with Brandon
- 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM
2803 Views
I found it painful to read
- 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM
1030 Views
Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
- 22/04/2012 04:26:27 AM
871 Views
Re: Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
- 22/04/2012 08:06:38 AM
947 Views
Re: Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
- 22/04/2012 02:39:41 PM
879 Views
*NM*
*NM*
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon
- 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM
960 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM
1170 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM
969 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here
- 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM
963 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM
879 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM
955 Views
It's got little to do with obsession...
- 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM
870 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession...
- 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM
880 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession...
- 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM
814 Views
Question about TGS and ToM:
- 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM
782 Views
Very similar to you
- 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM
901 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books?
- 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM
848 Views
of course there's no plan
- 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM
1227 Views
Egwene...
- 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM
812 Views
Re: Egwene...
- 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM
823 Views
Re: Egwene...
- 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM
799 Views
I don't find it all that surprising
- 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM
742 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising
- 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM
750 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising
- 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM
678 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens
- 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM
844 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens
- 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM
707 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone
- 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM
714 Views
Re: Egwene...
- 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM
688 Views
Re: Egwene...
- 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM
768 Views
Re: Egwene...
- 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM
1011 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 01/05/2012 12:08:33 AM
917 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
- 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM
890 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined
- 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM
896 Views
Elminster vs Karsus, Darth Vader vs Darth Revan, Demandred vs Sammael - who has more midichloriants.
- 25/04/2012 03:13:17 PM
1155 Views
