Active Users:1995 Time:01/05/2026 05:13:30 AM
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM
I share Sidous's unease with the casual disregard he displays to something like channeler strength, the identificaiton of individual angreal etc.


I'm curious about why people find relative strengths in the One Power to be so interesting. Being a physicist of the theoretical orientation, I absolutely agree that it can be interesting to study something with little or no practical application, but I've never had that much interest in strength. I'll happily discuss other aspects of the One Power, though, such as how Traveling became a lost Talent. If anyone can shed some light on why they are interested in One Power strength, I'd be happy to read it.


yet many of the main characters are obsessive about judging Strength. I like the vague nature RJ gave the subject as it allows for people to make their own determinations on how powerful a character is within the magic system. Ages old debate about how close Nynaeve and Egwene are in strength or how strong Moiraine is in overall terms which helps us understand just how much more powerful the Forsaken are than modern AS. Although I've long been a proponent that skill and training against a channelers specific Talents and Affinities are far more important than simple raw strength.

Egwene is a prime example of a Channeler who has mastered her Talents and Affinities and is incredibly effective as a Channeler despite not having the raw strength of Alivia who has little practical training and despite a bevy of tools and destructive weave knowledge couldn't manage to defeat a much more skilled opponent. IMO Egwene in that scenario would have performed much better against Cyndane because she knows how to most effectively use her abilities.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3211 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1567 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 650 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1448 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1299 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 1195 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1341 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1725 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 708 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1369 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 766 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 695 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 716 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1384 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1428 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1233 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1646 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1434 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1316 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1289 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1481 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1414 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1268 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 1149 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1287 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1377 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1268 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1313 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1321 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1246 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 1198 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1327 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1261 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1647 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 1154 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1395 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1210 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1258 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1217 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 1137 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 1144 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 1173 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 1094 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1232 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 1156 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1227 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 1050 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 1096 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1461 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1296 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 1115 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 1206 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1428 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 1061 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1291 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1286 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1269 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1296 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1294 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 1159 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 1161 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 673 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 1165 Views

Reply to Message