Active Users:582 Time:16/06/2026 08:09:53 AM
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM
I share Sidous's unease with the casual disregard he displays to something like channeler strength, the identificaiton of individual angreal etc.


I'm curious about why people find relative strengths in the One Power to be so interesting. Being a physicist of the theoretical orientation, I absolutely agree that it can be interesting to study something with little or no practical application, but I've never had that much interest in strength. I'll happily discuss other aspects of the One Power, though, such as how Traveling became a lost Talent. If anyone can shed some light on why they are interested in One Power strength, I'd be happy to read it.


yet many of the main characters are obsessive about judging Strength. I like the vague nature RJ gave the subject as it allows for people to make their own determinations on how powerful a character is within the magic system. Ages old debate about how close Nynaeve and Egwene are in strength or how strong Moiraine is in overall terms which helps us understand just how much more powerful the Forsaken are than modern AS. Although I've long been a proponent that skill and training against a channelers specific Talents and Affinities are far more important than simple raw strength.

Egwene is a prime example of a Channeler who has mastered her Talents and Affinities and is incredibly effective as a Channeler despite not having the raw strength of Alivia who has little practical training and despite a bevy of tools and destructive weave knowledge couldn't manage to defeat a much more skilled opponent. IMO Egwene in that scenario would have performed much better against Cyndane because she knows how to most effectively use her abilities.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3231 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1593 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 667 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1481 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1330 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 1219 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1376 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1755 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 731 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1395 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 782 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 711 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 735 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1416 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1453 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1264 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1681 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1463 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1340 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1318 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1508 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1450 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1311 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 1185 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1314 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1407 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1299 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1357 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1360 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1279 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 1233 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1374 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1291 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1683 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 1183 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1426 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1236 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1294 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1251 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 1173 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 1179 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 1204 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 1131 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1265 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 1185 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1269 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 1077 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 1128 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1487 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1326 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 1143 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 1232 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1456 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 1088 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1316 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1319 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1309 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1330 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1336 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 1193 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 1197 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 692 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 1192 Views

Reply to Message