Active Users:1056 Time:18/09/2026 01:20:14 AM
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM
I share Sidous's unease with the casual disregard he displays to something like channeler strength, the identificaiton of individual angreal etc.


I'm curious about why people find relative strengths in the One Power to be so interesting. Being a physicist of the theoretical orientation, I absolutely agree that it can be interesting to study something with little or no practical application, but I've never had that much interest in strength. I'll happily discuss other aspects of the One Power, though, such as how Traveling became a lost Talent. If anyone can shed some light on why they are interested in One Power strength, I'd be happy to read it.


yet many of the main characters are obsessive about judging Strength. I like the vague nature RJ gave the subject as it allows for people to make their own determinations on how powerful a character is within the magic system. Ages old debate about how close Nynaeve and Egwene are in strength or how strong Moiraine is in overall terms which helps us understand just how much more powerful the Forsaken are than modern AS. Although I've long been a proponent that skill and training against a channelers specific Talents and Affinities are far more important than simple raw strength.

Egwene is a prime example of a Channeler who has mastered her Talents and Affinities and is incredibly effective as a Channeler despite not having the raw strength of Alivia who has little practical training and despite a bevy of tools and destructive weave knowledge couldn't manage to defeat a much more skilled opponent. IMO Egwene in that scenario would have performed much better against Cyndane because she knows how to most effectively use her abilities.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3283 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1637 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 697 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1533 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1369 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 1268 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1426 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1810 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 781 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1459 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 812 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 739 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 779 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1459 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1502 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1314 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1740 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1518 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1396 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1391 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1567 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1558 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1385 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 1255 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1386 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1471 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1361 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1440 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1423 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1347 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 1278 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1441 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1360 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1739 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 1231 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1489 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1284 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1356 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1294 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 1228 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 1234 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 1250 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 1196 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1317 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 1242 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1316 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 1132 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 1188 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1542 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1372 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 1191 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 1286 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1519 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 1136 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1377 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1371 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1391 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1393 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1416 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 1244 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 1243 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 724 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 1245 Views

Reply to Message