Active Users:2321 Time:24/10/2026 09:18:03 PM
That's a classic. Shannow Send a noteboard - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM
And what she felt there was his Raw strength.


She cannot feel raw saidin. All she can feel is the effect of his weaves. Which is his effective strength.


I long ago discounted anything you had to day based on your lack of knowledge on the series.


I may totally disagree with your views, but that would not prompt me to claim that you lack knowledge of the series.

Conversely, for you to claim that someone who has spent a decade debating about the minutae of a series of books - rereading them countless times in the process to the point of the pages starting to fall apart - lacks knowledge of the series, is well, interesting.

I'll move past that comment, and speak to the issue at hand.

What is effective strength other than the effect that your weaves have on the world? Egwene cannot sense saidin. It is impossible for a woman to do so.

Hence, she can never "feel" Rand's raw strength. All she can ever judge, is the effect that his weaves have on her and on the world around her.

So when she feels his weaves cut her and Elayne off from the source, and see him weave a dozen other webs at the same time, she uses that effect that he can achieve with his weaves - his effective strength in other words - to estimate his strength.

That is all she can ever do, because she can never see, feel or sense in any way the raw volume of saidin that he is channeling.

She can only ever judge the effect that he is able to achieve with it. Hence, she can judge his effective strength. Similarly, that is all a man can ever judge a woman's strength on.

What she can do with the Power. Because they cannot sense the volumes being channeled by the other sex.


As a knowledgeable reader of the series, you would know that. Hence, you would know that your point is in fact a non-starter.

This message last edited by Shannow on 04/11/2012 at 12:08:09 AM
Reply to message
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM 1881 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow - 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM 1165 Views
One more point here - 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM 1045 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key... - 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM 1338 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better - 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM 1279 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible... - 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM 1259 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean - 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM 1046 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD... - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM 952 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear - 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM 1136 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention. - 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM 1015 Views
OMG no it is NOT! - 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM 949 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve. - 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM 1248 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM 1064 Views
Confusing post... - 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM 1143 Views
Dreadlord is essentially describing a lognormal distribution - 02/11/2012 07:21:39 PM 992 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong - 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM 1159 Views
A non-linear 21 point scale is fine... - 02/11/2012 11:02:48 PM 1229 Views
I've been operating off of the scale I described for years - 02/11/2012 11:25:27 PM 1085 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM 1106 Views
Not true - 02/11/2012 08:52:42 PM 1133 Views
Re: Not true - 03/11/2012 09:19:11 AM 1122 Views
Read my other posts - 03/11/2012 04:19:15 PM 919 Views
Not quite - 03/11/2012 08:02:05 AM 1102 Views
I think it's about skill not strength - 03/11/2012 04:38:07 PM 906 Views
I think the number is about 10 - 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM 1134 Views
Nope - 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM 1073 Views
Re: Nope - 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM 1095 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM 1100 Views
Re: Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 10:15:10 PM 1090 Views
*shrugs* - 03/11/2012 10:25:18 PM 984 Views
Re: *shrugs* - 04/11/2012 07:12:21 AM 1175 Views
You have 4 markers and you should use them all - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM 908 Views
Indeed - 10/11/2012 03:59:51 PM 1075 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM 1109 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM 1087 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:02:58 PM 1091 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:56:50 PM 1161 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this - 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM 1153 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM 896 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor - 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM 996 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote - 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM 1069 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about - 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM 992 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM 1060 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand - 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM 947 Views
Nonsense. - 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM 1003 Views
Believe as you will - 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM 1124 Views
That's a classic. - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM 1037 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series - 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM 902 Views
Hmm... - 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM 1236 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you - 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM 1038 Views

Reply to Message