Active Users:872 Time:23/07/2026 10:08:51 AM
I don't need to interpret the following in any way other than the obvious to get the picture... Shannow Send a noteboard - 04/11/2012 12:17:53 AM
And what she felt there was his Raw strength.

Speaking of wishful thinking, why don't you go make up one of your fantasy quotes now :P

You two need to realize thatim not trying to convince either of you of anything. I believe what I believe in the series and I express that here. I could give a rats ass about convincing you to think about it the way I do. I simpy think the two of you have a very skewed perspective on the Forsaken's strength based on the books and various quotes from the author


And not on fact.


The difference is i don't have any one character or set of characters I want to be stronger or weaker, I think the books make strength pretty obvious in a broad sense. RJ made it even more clear by talking about his own scale. You choose to ignore these things to make the Forsaken stronger and I don't understand why that matters so much. You've been proven wrong over and over when the author makes quotes, I recall both you and Sidious arguing that Nynaeve wasn't all that amazing in strength until Brandon announced that she was only weaker than 6 women.

I'm far more interested in their skill levels than something as trivial as their OP strength. When I see a quote from Egwene that flat out states she can face and defeat Mesaana I see that she has become far more skilled since her earlier statements. It is also clear that sheis not far from the Forsaken in strength. Never mind that RJ himself said she was ONE LEVEL below. You and Sidious clearly NEED the Forsaken to be so powerful that they should be unbeatable. I think they are much interesting characters if they are powerful through skill.


RJ calls Nynaeve bonfire next to a candle compared to Egwene.

RJ lets Egwene say that she and Elayne are hopelessly overmatched by Rand. A Rand that cannot even take hold of the Source every time he tries to at that point.

RJ has Loial tell us that 6 sisters could not defeat Guare Amalasan or Yurian Stonebow, despite these guys being self taught compared to the skilled sisters they were facing. Sisters from a thousand years or more ago, when Aes Sedai were still stronger on average than today.

RJ has Logain able to break free from 5 modern sisters.

RJ has Flinn's circle exactly match Demandred's strength.

RJ has Egwene say that she plus Romanda plus Lelaine might be able to match 1 male Forsaken.

RJ has Egwene say that she would stand no chance against Moghedien loose in Salidar.

The list goes on.

I'm not the one that created the idea of the Forsaken being so much stronger than modern Aes Sedai. RJ did that all on his own.

You are the one looking for evidence to prove your contrarian theories. My view is the conventional one, supported by the books.
Reply to message
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM 1800 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow - 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM 1122 Views
One more point here - 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM 995 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key... - 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM 1271 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better - 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM 1216 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible... - 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM 1199 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean - 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM 995 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD... - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM 894 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear - 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM 1078 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention. - 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM 963 Views
OMG no it is NOT! - 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM 892 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve. - 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM 1194 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM 1017 Views
Confusing post... - 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM 1091 Views
Dreadlord is essentially describing a lognormal distribution - 02/11/2012 07:21:39 PM 945 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong - 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM 1085 Views
A non-linear 21 point scale is fine... - 02/11/2012 11:02:48 PM 1161 Views
I've been operating off of the scale I described for years - 02/11/2012 11:25:27 PM 1039 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM 1055 Views
Not true - 02/11/2012 08:52:42 PM 1079 Views
Re: Not true - 03/11/2012 09:19:11 AM 1061 Views
Read my other posts - 03/11/2012 04:19:15 PM 868 Views
Not quite - 03/11/2012 08:02:05 AM 1049 Views
I think it's about skill not strength - 03/11/2012 04:38:07 PM 863 Views
I think the number is about 10 - 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM 1086 Views
Nope - 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM 1022 Views
Re: Nope - 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM 1044 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM 1041 Views
Re: Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 10:15:10 PM 1038 Views
*shrugs* - 03/11/2012 10:25:18 PM 937 Views
Re: *shrugs* - 04/11/2012 07:12:21 AM 1130 Views
You have 4 markers and you should use them all - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM 861 Views
Indeed - 10/11/2012 03:59:51 PM 1021 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM 1055 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM 1023 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:02:58 PM 1042 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:56:50 PM 1115 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this - 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM 1089 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM 839 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor - 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM 943 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote - 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM 984 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about - 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM 940 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM 985 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand - 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM 904 Views
Nonsense. - 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM 922 Views
Believe as you will - 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM 1080 Views
That's a classic. - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM 973 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series - 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM 851 Views
Hmm... - 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM 1183 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you - 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM 988 Views
Reply to your EDIT: I think YOU have a totally warped perspective, based on what you wish for. - 03/11/2012 11:16:29 PM 966 Views
Funny that's exactly how I see your perspective - 03/11/2012 11:25:52 PM 942 Views
I don't need to interpret the following in any way other than the obvious to get the picture... - 04/11/2012 12:17:53 AM 2504 Views

Reply to Message