Active Users:826 Time:21/02/2026 10:57:58 PM
... Oh! I get it it now. The Tower likely just sends sisters out of the city to have their kids. lol Dunstan Send a noteboard - 14/10/2016 04:38:30 PM

View original post
You know a few Aes Sedai will have kids despite the "discouraged behavior" ... hell, even an accidental pregnancy isn't out of the question, although I wouldn't be shocked if abortion was considered in these cases. Aes Sedai probably on some level realize that genetics play a role (there have been a few siblings in the Tower), so I imagine the fear of a male child would be rather high.

IIRC, the Companion tells us Basil Gill and his family were related to the Aes Sedai Jennet Cobb, she was revealed to be Basil's Great-Great-Aunt, descended from one of her brothers ... she was one of the Ferrets sent by Sheriam.

Obviously not a direct example, but it seems likely that there are some families of Aes Sedai floating around. IIRC Hawkwing's second wife was rumored to be a rogue Aes Sedai, and given that Siuan and Moiraine have to be told by their Ajah that the Blue specifically does not allow marriage for members, it also seems highly likely that other Ajahs (certainly the Green) allow for marriage, which you have to figure at some point will lead to a child or two.


Even with the issues of power level and gender. It's still a thing that is going to happen, but for all that... Wanting to keep pregnant sisters out of the eyes of the Tower's servants seems like a very Aes Sedai thing to do.

... Though all that would really answer is why said Aes Sedai brats aren't listed as coming from Tar Valon. Not why there aren't any Aes Sedai brats.

Reply to message
Noticed something odd - 13/10/2016 09:31:54 PM 1396 Views
Familiarity breeds contempt? - 14/10/2016 12:41:44 AM 1290 Views
I can see how this would keep a woman from attaining the Shawl - 14/10/2016 03:00:32 PM 908 Views
Re: Familiarity breeds contempt? - 17/10/2016 06:35:20 PM 1049 Views
Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 11:25:44 AM 1001 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 03:54:23 PM 959 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 04:02:54 PM 862 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 05:03:58 PM 867 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 07:18:13 PM 978 Views
I think politics keeps women away from the Blue - 18/10/2016 10:20:50 PM 888 Views
I think it's RJ's gender commentary - Blue are ambitious, which is not a stereotypical female trait - 19/10/2016 02:57:51 AM 1113 Views
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM 946 Views
Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:19:01 PM 1056 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:48:17 PM 845 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 06:13:27 PM 906 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 07:14:51 PM 784 Views
I guess that's my issue with it - 20/10/2016 09:53:38 PM 1006 Views
Technically men would only be a threat up to a certain age(which they should know) unless trained.. - 21/10/2016 08:47:20 AM 1140 Views
Male sparkers can spark as late as 30 or so - 21/10/2016 03:16:26 PM 901 Views
Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 08:38:07 AM 893 Views
Re: Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 09:21:13 AM 968 Views
Comparative to joining the Red is how I meant that - 21/10/2016 03:22:46 PM 906 Views
Forget the "locals"... IIRC Aes Sedai have kids "rarely" not "never". - 14/10/2016 06:40:56 AM 883 Views
Another good point! - 14/10/2016 03:28:44 PM 838 Views
... Oh! I get it it now. The Tower likely just sends sisters out of the city to have their kids. lol - 14/10/2016 04:38:30 PM 892 Views
Re: Noticed something odd - 11/11/2016 12:54:24 AM 1061 Views
Possibly, - 11/11/2016 08:45:15 PM 1201 Views

Reply to Message