I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2246 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
978 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1215 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1482 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1330 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
938 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1500 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
968 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
389 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1221 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
786 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
842 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
869 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
904 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
795 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
807 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
863 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
1022 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
918 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
420 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
408 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
408 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1047 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
900 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1662 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
814 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
940 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
940 Views

.