I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
- 2073 Views
Makes sense, but...
03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
- 817 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
- 1062 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
- 1328 Views
Is this the real stilling?
04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
- 1175 Views
It's real stilling
04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
- 785 Views
Re: It's real stilling
04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
- 1340 Views
Re: It's real stilling
04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
- 794 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
- 310 Views
Not in my opinion
05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
- 1082 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
- 661 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
- 686 Views
I disagree.
04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
- 738 Views
Re: I disagree.
05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
- 754 Views
Then...
05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
- 655 Views
Re: Then...
05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
- 670 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
- 709 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
- 875 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
- 759 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
- 338 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
- 330 Views

Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
- 888 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
- 741 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
- 1433 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
- 665 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
- 773 Views
