I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2201 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
943 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1183 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1448 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1286 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
901 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1466 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
933 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
373 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1183 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
755 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
809 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
840 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
871 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
761 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
770 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
829 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
990 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
883 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
407 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
393 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
393 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1019 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
869 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1626 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
790 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
901 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
901 Views

.