Active Users:2343 Time:18/06/2026 03:04:53 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2332 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 898 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 457 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1064 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1285 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1422 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1014 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1576 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1045 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 429 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1302 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 869 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 920 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 845 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 959 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 940 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 983 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 888 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 890 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 993 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 897 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 950 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1099 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1003 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 943 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1065 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1019 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1075 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 924 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1132 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 983 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1752 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1000 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1095 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1622 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 881 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 1017 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 999 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1702 Views

Reply to Message