Active Users:1203 Time:13/11/2026 04:27:14 PM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2473 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 982 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 518 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1161 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1424 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1542 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1123 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1669 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1144 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 474 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1395 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 967 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 1024 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 945 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1084 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 1029 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1077 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 993 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 985 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1088 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 995 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 1071 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1234 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1130 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 1049 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1167 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1119 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1179 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 1025 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1264 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1089 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1877 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1105 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1193 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1751 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 980 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 1156 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1098 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1798 Views

Reply to Message