Active Users:1512 Time:19/09/2026 10:41:47 AM
Re: Then... Sidious Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.

From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.

For me strength and precision weaving go hand in hand.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2416 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 950 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 496 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1117 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1365 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1497 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1081 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1636 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1109 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 460 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1357 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 926 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 989 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 906 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1032 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 993 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1041 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 947 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 949 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1058 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 968 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 1027 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1178 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1074 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 1008 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1127 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1070 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1138 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 988 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1212 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1047 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1823 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1065 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1152 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1702 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 945 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1065 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1763 Views

Reply to Message