Active Users:1083 Time:03/05/2026 09:39:35 PM
Re: Then... Sidious Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.

From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.

For me strength and precision weaving go hand in hand.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2303 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 876 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 441 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1037 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1255 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1389 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 990 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1548 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1021 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 412 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1279 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 839 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 893 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 820 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 930 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 914 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 955 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 854 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 858 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 958 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 868 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 917 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1068 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 975 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 908 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1040 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 988 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1051 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 896 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1101 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 959 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1716 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 973 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1067 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1584 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 857 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 975 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1675 Views

Reply to Message