Active Users:1212 Time:13/11/2026 04:27:16 PM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2474 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 982 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 519 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1162 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1424 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1543 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1124 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1670 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1144 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 474 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1395 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 967 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 1024 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 945 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1084 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 1030 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1077 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 993 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 985 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1088 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 995 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 1072 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1234 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1131 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 1049 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1168 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1119 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1180 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 1026 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1264 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1089 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1877 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1105 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1193 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1752 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 981 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1098 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1798 Views

Reply to Message