I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2247 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
979 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1215 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1483 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1332 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
939 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1500 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
969 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
390 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1222 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
790 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
843 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
871 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
905 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
796 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
808 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
866 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
1023 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
919 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
421 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
409 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
409 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1049 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
901 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1662 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
815 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
941 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
941 Views

.