I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2305 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
1037 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1256 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1535 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1390 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
990 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1548 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
1021 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
413 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1279 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
839 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
894 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
914 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
955 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
855 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
858 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
917 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
1069 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
975 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
439 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
433 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
433 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1102 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
959 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1716 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
857 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
988 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
988 Views

.