Active Users:1592 Time:03/08/2026 06:46:57 AM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2380 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 930 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 481 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1093 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1336 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1467 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1054 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1608 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1082 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 449 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1336 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 902 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 964 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 886 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1006 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 969 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1019 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 926 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 929 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1030 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 943 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 990 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1151 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1046 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 984 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1097 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1049 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1115 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 960 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1178 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1020 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1792 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1041 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1130 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1662 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 920 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1033 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1741 Views

Reply to Message