Active Users:387 Time:18/06/2025 01:28:24 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2091 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 684 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 351 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 832 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1078 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1193 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 800 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1358 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 808 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 316 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1096 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 672 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 700 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 642 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 707 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 753 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 767 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 667 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 684 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 740 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 687 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 721 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 890 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 775 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 714 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 823 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 797 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 851 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 678 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 906 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 754 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1472 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 766 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 847 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1387 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 680 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 792 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 797 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1466 Views

Reply to Message