Active Users:560 Time:17/12/2025 09:36:53 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1898 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 839 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 908 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 447 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 878 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 895 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 954 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 933 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 872 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 770 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 758 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 784 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 784 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 780 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 733 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 823 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 782 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 807 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 783 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 754 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 797 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 786 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 799 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 876 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 833 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 808 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 745 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 806 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 704 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 771 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 789 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 845 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 710 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 679 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 738 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 800 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 413 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 726 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 841 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 399 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 716 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 369 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 762 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 397 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 799 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 709 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 783 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 756 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 747 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 387 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 372 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 332 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 774 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 772 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 761 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 708 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 754 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 401 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 715 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 388 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 737 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 357 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes