Active Users:435 Time:18/09/2025 12:53:44 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1830 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 795 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 860 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 409 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 813 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 799 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 912 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 871 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 815 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 692 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 711 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 732 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 731 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 739 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 684 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 783 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 735 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 749 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 724 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 694 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 757 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 723 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 741 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 820 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 773 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 774 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 701 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 744 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 658 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 725 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 750 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 772 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 651 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 633 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 683 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 743 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 381 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 671 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 785 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 367 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 662 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 348 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 714 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 367 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 733 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 670 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 738 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 699 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 706 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 364 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 345 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 309 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 700 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 718 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 705 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 660 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 705 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 362 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 672 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 355 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 665 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 323 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes