Active Users:691 Time:03/08/2025 04:53:40 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1805 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 758 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 833 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 394 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 771 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 763 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 877 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 833 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 780 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 665 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 680 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 700 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 699 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 707 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 660 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 748 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 695 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 702 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 694 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 663 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 721 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 689 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 704 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 781 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 742 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 742 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 659 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 703 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 639 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 705 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 711 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 742 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 603 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 604 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 652 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 713 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 366 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 646 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 757 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 351 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 634 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 333 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 683 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 345 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 699 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 626 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 714 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 663 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 675 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 352 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 323 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 300 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 661 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 672 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 673 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 620 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 661 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 347 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 637 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 337 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 630 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 297 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes