Active Users:324 Time:30/04/2025 07:16:02 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1748 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 723 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 792 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 374 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 713 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 842 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 798 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 743 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 630 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 645 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 663 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 663 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 674 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 630 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 655 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 668 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 653 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 632 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 690 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 657 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 669 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 704 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 708 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 627 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 665 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 602 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 668 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 675 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 707 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 567 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 621 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 568 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 700 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 599 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 316 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 650 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 326 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 661 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 588 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 678 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 626 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 632 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 333 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 302 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 283 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 621 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 642 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 633 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 584 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 327 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 597 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 317 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 599 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 276 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes