There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
Rand al'Thor Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
The only thing that is discussed is how far back the effects of balefire go. There's no definitive discussion on ANYthing else.
Notice something about Sanderson's comments. He said, 'let's say that the CK makes Rand 100x more powerful'. He's not saying it DOES - that's just his supposition. That's beautiful Aes Sedai misdirection.
---
Extending that thought further then...
Why can't the CK make Rand more like 10,000x more powerful? That's always the order of magnitude I was imagining based on the descriptions in the book... for the strongest sa'angreal ever made? When an 'average' sa'angreal raises the user's ability above that of an angreal to the same order of magnitude that an 'average' angreal does over using no enhancement?
With that in mind, the existence of multiple sa'angreal multiplying your power 250x becomes extremely likely. 100x is certainly nothing special for a sa'angreal... and when you consider that these CK were considered 'too strong to ever be used', able to fight the Dark One (or the CREATOR, by Lanfear!), and able to crack the world in half... 100x Rand's power just doesn't fit the description.
10,000 times 30 minutes of Rand back-tracking is approximately 200 days. This isn't a proof that this happened, of course, but a proof of concept. If we can reach back in the vicinity of a year, then anything is still possible. And nothing Sanderson said ruled it out... all he addressed was a very limited 'what if'.
Notice something about Sanderson's comments. He said, 'let's say that the CK makes Rand 100x more powerful'. He's not saying it DOES - that's just his supposition. That's beautiful Aes Sedai misdirection.
---
Extending that thought further then...
Why can't the CK make Rand more like 10,000x more powerful? That's always the order of magnitude I was imagining based on the descriptions in the book... for the strongest sa'angreal ever made? When an 'average' sa'angreal raises the user's ability above that of an angreal to the same order of magnitude that an 'average' angreal does over using no enhancement?
With that in mind, the existence of multiple sa'angreal multiplying your power 250x becomes extremely likely. 100x is certainly nothing special for a sa'angreal... and when you consider that these CK were considered 'too strong to ever be used', able to fight the Dark One (or the CREATOR, by Lanfear!), and able to crack the world in half... 100x Rand's power just doesn't fit the description.
10,000 times 30 minutes of Rand back-tracking is approximately 200 days. This isn't a proof that this happened, of course, but a proof of concept. If we can reach back in the vicinity of a year, then anything is still possible. And nothing Sanderson said ruled it out... all he addressed was a very limited 'what if'.
Former wotmaniac Rand al`Thor, 2001-2009. RIP wotmania...
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
- 1830 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
- 794 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
- 409 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
- 813 Views
It eliminates for the following
11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
- 798 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
- 912 Views
I can't follow your logic
11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
- 684 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
- 748 Views
your interpretation is wrong
11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
- 757 Views
I generally agree...
11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
- 820 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
- 744 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
- 658 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
- 725 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
- 749 Views
This logic is lacking as well
11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
- 772 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
- 742 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
- 381 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
- 671 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
- 785 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
- 367 Views
What? Did you double post?
11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
- 662 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process
*NM*
11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
- 347 Views

According to Etzel, this is impossible
12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
- 713 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
- 732 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
- 363 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
- 699 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
- 718 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
- 671 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
- 355 Views