Active Users:350 Time:01/05/2025 02:06:41 AM
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
The only thing that is discussed is how far back the effects of balefire go. There's no definitive discussion on ANYthing else.

Notice something about Sanderson's comments. He said, 'let's say that the CK makes Rand 100x more powerful'. He's not saying it DOES - that's just his supposition. That's beautiful Aes Sedai misdirection.

---

Extending that thought further then...

Why can't the CK make Rand more like 10,000x more powerful? That's always the order of magnitude I was imagining based on the descriptions in the book... for the strongest sa'angreal ever made? When an 'average' sa'angreal raises the user's ability above that of an angreal to the same order of magnitude that an 'average' angreal does over using no enhancement?

With that in mind, the existence of multiple sa'angreal multiplying your power 250x becomes extremely likely. 100x is certainly nothing special for a sa'angreal... and when you consider that these CK were considered 'too strong to ever be used', able to fight the Dark One (or the CREATOR, by Lanfear!), and able to crack the world in half... 100x Rand's power just doesn't fit the description.

10,000 times 30 minutes of Rand back-tracking is approximately 200 days. This isn't a proof that this happened, of course, but a proof of concept. If we can reach back in the vicinity of a year, then anything is still possible. And nothing Sanderson said ruled it out... all he addressed was a very limited 'what if'.
Former wotmaniac Rand al`Thor, 2001-2009. RIP wotmania...
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1748 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 723 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 792 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 374 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 713 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 842 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 799 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 743 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 631 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 645 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 663 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 663 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 675 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 630 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 655 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 668 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 654 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 633 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 690 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 657 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 669 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 704 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 708 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 627 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 666 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 707 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 567 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 621 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 700 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 599 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 650 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 326 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 661 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 589 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 679 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 627 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 632 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 302 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 283 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 642 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 633 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 584 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 599 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 276 Views

Reply to Message