Active Users:627 Time:19/03/2026 03:25:05 PM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1948 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 883 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 951 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 469 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 938 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 937 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1004 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 981 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 914 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 819 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 799 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 832 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 830 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 827 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 767 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 861 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 824 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 854 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 827 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 800 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 833 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 840 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 863 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 920 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 892 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 853 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 791 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 856 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 899 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 763 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 731 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 788 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 844 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 432 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 886 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 414 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 764 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 823 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 415 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 842 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 750 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 831 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 797 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 810 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 390 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 350 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 814 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 817 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 752 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 795 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 419 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 778 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 377 Views

Reply to Message