Active Users:363 Time:01/05/2025 01:58:59 AM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1748 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 723 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 792 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 374 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 713 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 842 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 799 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 743 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 630 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 645 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 663 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 663 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 674 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 630 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 655 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 668 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 653 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 633 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 690 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 657 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 669 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 704 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 708 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 627 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 665 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 707 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 567 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 621 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 700 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 599 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 650 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 326 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 661 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 589 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 679 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 627 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 632 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 302 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 283 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 642 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 633 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 584 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 599 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 276 Views

Reply to Message